Tomato is one of the most widely cultivated and extensively consumed horticultural crops worldwide. However, it is more vulnerable to post harvest losses than other crops due to its more perishable property. This experiment was, therefore, conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of different storage methods in improving shelf life of tomato fruits. The experiment consisted of three treatments (storage using pot in pot technique, cooling (Refrigerator) and room temperature (control). Which were laid out in completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications. A total of 138 tomato fruits with uniform maturity stage, shape and size were collected from Holeta Horticulture research field and 46 fruits were randomly assigned to each treatment. Highly significant (P<0.001) minimum loss of physicochemical properties (pH, TA and TSS) along time (1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 days) was observed for fruits stored using pot in pot technique. The highest mean weight loss percentage was observed for fruits stored under room temperature. Results of sensory evaluation along time revealed that there was highly significant difference (P<0.001) among the treatments. Accordingly, the highest mean scores of firmness (4.07+0.87), color (4.08+1.03) and overall acceptability (4.00+0.92) were recorded for tomato fruits stored using pot in pot technique at 18°C, while the value for general appearance (3.92+0.94) was higher for fruits in refrigerator at 13°C. In general, pot in pot method was found to be best suited for 30days storage period at 18°C without much affecting quality of tomato fruits.
Published in | American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering (Volume 13, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.bio.20251303.12 |
Page(s) | 35-42 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Cooling, Evaporative, Physicochemical, Pot in Pot, Shelf Life, Tomato
[1] | AOAC, 2006. Official Methods of Analysis, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 21st Ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemist. Washington, D. C., USA. |
[2] | KC. Babitha, BT. Ninganur, MB. Chetti, DI. Jirali, SI., Harlapur, Effect of harvest treatment and storage conditions on physico-chemical parameters in extending shelf life in tomato. Plant Archives, 10(1), 37-47, 2010. |
[3] | J. Bai, V. Alleyne, D. Robert, J. Hagenmaier, P. Matthesis, A. Elizabeth, Baldwin, J. Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 28, 259-268, 2003. |
[4] | LR. Castro, C. Vigneault, MT. Charles, LAB. Cortez, Effect of cooling delay and cold-chain breakage on ‘Santa Clara’ tomato. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 3(1), 49-54, 2005. |
[5] | P. Dorosh, S. Rashid, Food and Agriculture in Ethiopia, IFPRI, Washington, DC, USA, 2010. |
[6] | TD. Banjaw. EIAR, Review of post harvest loss of horticultural crops in Ethiopia, its causes and mitigation strategies, 1-13, 2017. |
[7] | Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization (EARO), Food Science and Post -Harvest Technology Research Strategy, Nazareth, Ethiopia, 2000. |
[8] | J. Haji, Production Efficiency of Smallholders’ Vegetable-dominated Mixed Farming System in Eastern Ethiopia: A Non-Parametric Approach. Journal of African Economies, 16(1), 1-27, 2007. |
[9] | IA. Hassan, JM. Basahi, IM. Ismail, TM. Habeebullah, Spatial Distribution and Temporal Variation in Ambient Ozone and Its Associated NOx in the Atmosphere of Jeddah City, Saudi Arabia, Aerosol Air Qual, Res. 13, 1712-1722, 2013. |
[10] | SN. Jha, Kudas, SK. Aleksha, Determination of physical properties of pads for maximizing cooling in evaporative cooled store. J. Agri. Eng, 43(4), 92-97, 2006. |
[11] | R. Kirk, R. Sawyer, Pearson’s Composition and Analysis of Food (9th Edition), 253-256, 1991. |
[12] | L. Kitinoja, Causes and sources of postharvest problems. Postharvest Training CD Rom/sample Presentations from Ghana, 1-19, 2008. |
[13] | A. Kramer, Evaluation of quality of fruits and vegetables, In: Food Quality, G. M. Irving, Jr. and S. R. Hoove (Eds.) American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, 9-18, 1965. |
[14] | JO. Kuti, HB. Konuru, Effects of genotype and cultivation environment on lycopene content in red- ripe tomatoes. J. Sci. Food Agric, 85, 2021-2026, 2005. |
[15] | K. M. Moneruzzaman, A. B. M. S. Hossain, W. Sani, M. Saifuddin, M. Alinazi, Effect of harvesting and storage conditions on the postharvest quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) cv. Roma VF, Aust. J. Crop Sci. Sou. Cross J. 3, 113-131, 2009. |
[16] | M. Murugan, S. A. J. A Ranjith, S. Vidya, Evaluation of shelf life and organoleptic aspects of fruits stored in a modified tradition earthen up pot cool chamber, Ind. J Trad. Know. 10(2), 375-379, 2011. |
[17] | P. Nirupama, B. Neeta, TV. Ramana, Effect of postharvest Treatments on physicochemical characteristics and shelf life of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Fruits during storage, Am-Eur. J of Agr. & Env. Sci., 9(5), 470-479, 2010.) |
[18] | WA. Olosunde, Performance Evaluation of Absorbent Materials in the Evaporation of cooling system for the storage of fruits and vegetable. M.sc thesis, Department of Agricultural Engineering, University of Ibadan, 2006. |
[19] | NC. Patel, MN. Dabhi, NK. Dhamsaniya, Effect of storage conditions on the quality characteristics of onion. J Food Sci Technol, 45, 376-377, 2008. |
[20] | D. Sisay, Post-harvest losses of crops and its determinants in Ethiopia: to bit model analysis. Agriculture & Food Security, 11: 13, 2022. |
[21] | N. P. Okolie and T. E. Sanni, Effect of postharvest treatments on quality of whole tomatoes. Afr. J. of Food Sci, 6(3), 70-76, 2012. |
[22] | O. Oluwasola, Pot in pot preservation: Fridge for the poor. 7, 1-18, 2011. |
[23] | D. Garner, C. H Crisosto, P. Wiley, and G. M. Crisosto, Measurement of pH and Titrtable Acidiy, 2003. |
[24] | G. Tessema, Effect of postharvest treatments on storage behavior and quality of tomato fruits. World journal of agricultural science, 9(1), 29-37, 2013. |
APA Style
Zeynu, N., Keba, A. (2025). Evaluation of Storage Types with Pot-in-Pot Technique for Preservation of Tomato Fruit in Holeta, Western Shewa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 13(3), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20251303.12
ACS Style
Zeynu, N.; Keba, A. Evaluation of Storage Types with Pot-in-Pot Technique for Preservation of Tomato Fruit in Holeta, Western Shewa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. Am. J. BioSci. Bioeng. 2025, 13(3), 35-42. doi: 10.11648/j.bio.20251303.12
@article{10.11648/j.bio.20251303.12, author = {Nesru Zeynu and Abdi Keba}, title = {Evaluation of Storage Types with Pot-in-Pot Technique for Preservation of Tomato Fruit in Holeta, Western Shewa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia }, journal = {American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering}, volume = {13}, number = {3}, pages = {35-42}, doi = {10.11648/j.bio.20251303.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20251303.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.bio.20251303.12}, abstract = {Tomato is one of the most widely cultivated and extensively consumed horticultural crops worldwide. However, it is more vulnerable to post harvest losses than other crops due to its more perishable property. This experiment was, therefore, conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of different storage methods in improving shelf life of tomato fruits. The experiment consisted of three treatments (storage using pot in pot technique, cooling (Refrigerator) and room temperature (control). Which were laid out in completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications. A total of 138 tomato fruits with uniform maturity stage, shape and size were collected from Holeta Horticulture research field and 46 fruits were randomly assigned to each treatment. Highly significant (P<0.001) minimum loss of physicochemical properties (pH, TA and TSS) along time (1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 days) was observed for fruits stored using pot in pot technique. The highest mean weight loss percentage was observed for fruits stored under room temperature. Results of sensory evaluation along time revealed that there was highly significant difference (P<0.001) among the treatments. Accordingly, the highest mean scores of firmness (4.07+0.87), color (4.08+1.03) and overall acceptability (4.00+0.92) were recorded for tomato fruits stored using pot in pot technique at 18°C, while the value for general appearance (3.92+0.94) was higher for fruits in refrigerator at 13°C. In general, pot in pot method was found to be best suited for 30days storage period at 18°C without much affecting quality of tomato fruits. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of Storage Types with Pot-in-Pot Technique for Preservation of Tomato Fruit in Holeta, Western Shewa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia AU - Nesru Zeynu AU - Abdi Keba Y1 - 2025/05/29 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20251303.12 DO - 10.11648/j.bio.20251303.12 T2 - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering JF - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering JO - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering SP - 35 EP - 42 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5893 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20251303.12 AB - Tomato is one of the most widely cultivated and extensively consumed horticultural crops worldwide. However, it is more vulnerable to post harvest losses than other crops due to its more perishable property. This experiment was, therefore, conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of different storage methods in improving shelf life of tomato fruits. The experiment consisted of three treatments (storage using pot in pot technique, cooling (Refrigerator) and room temperature (control). Which were laid out in completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications. A total of 138 tomato fruits with uniform maturity stage, shape and size were collected from Holeta Horticulture research field and 46 fruits were randomly assigned to each treatment. Highly significant (P<0.001) minimum loss of physicochemical properties (pH, TA and TSS) along time (1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 days) was observed for fruits stored using pot in pot technique. The highest mean weight loss percentage was observed for fruits stored under room temperature. Results of sensory evaluation along time revealed that there was highly significant difference (P<0.001) among the treatments. Accordingly, the highest mean scores of firmness (4.07+0.87), color (4.08+1.03) and overall acceptability (4.00+0.92) were recorded for tomato fruits stored using pot in pot technique at 18°C, while the value for general appearance (3.92+0.94) was higher for fruits in refrigerator at 13°C. In general, pot in pot method was found to be best suited for 30days storage period at 18°C without much affecting quality of tomato fruits. VL - 13 IS - 3 ER -